dogsbite.org, a site of disinformation run by the vile bitch Colleen Lynn, is NOT a reputable site for statistics of any kind. Please stop using quotes from this site as "answers" to people's searches.
The information presented at this site is demonstrably false. Worse than that, it is clearly lies (here's just one example out of many debunking her bullshit). Doubt me. That's fine. I encourage it, in fact. Question everything. You will find, if you scratch the suface of this thing, that this website and its proprietress are not to be trusted. There is ample evidence. If you search, on Google, for Colleen Lynn, a related search is shown below the first page of results: is dogsbite.org accurate. Guess what, Google? The overwhelming consensus is that dogsbite.org is FULL OF SHIT.
So why are you presenting "answers" that are not true? Stop IT! This is inexcusable behavior.
Ok. Google. Are you listening?
Now, how did you come here, dear reader? Was it in relation to dogsbite.org? Or that vile bitch Colleen Lynn? What did you come searching for? Did you come looking for ammunition for your attempted genocide (since I seem hell-bent on the idea of making enemies today, we're just going to throw this into the mix: Fuck PETA! And fuck you, too, Ingrid Newkirk, you shameless, two-faced lying cunt. Ethical treament of animals my ass.)?
Or did you come here because you were looking for truth?
I'm fresh out of truth at the moment. All I have is an angry screed against disinformation, inhumane treatment of animals and lies.
I'm also pretty pissed off at Google. Search results are one thing, answers are something completely different. And if you are going to provide answers, you fucking well better be checking your facts. If you want to be in the answer business, first make sure you have the right answer.
So, lets recap, real quick, so I can make sure that I get these names in here again and boost my search rankings and get my screed in front of more people: PETA, Colleen Lynn, Ingrid Newkirk, dogsbite.org. Thats context. Ok, maybe its just a list. So lets give a little more context: dogsbite.org is full of shit and lies and if you do a little digging, you will discover this for yourself; dogsbite.org is run by a worthless excuse for a human being: Colleen Lynn, who wasn't satisfied when she had the dog that bit her killed, so she had to make this website and carry her crusade of stinking filth to the rest of the world; and last but not least, let us not forget that Ingrid Newkirk, that lying, two-faced bitch is all for the "ethical treatment of animals", unless those animals are short furred, muscular dogs, because those need to be eradicated from the face of the planet.
Did I miss anyone? Oh... right. Making enemies. How could I forget to call out the Acamdemic Imposter: Merritt Clifton. What a prince. Google Merritt Clifton and you will wonder why anyone gives any credence to what this jackass says. But, again, if you scratch the surface, you will find its all the same people advocating for genocide and supporting each other's wild claims and made up stastics.
I'm not hiding behind shit. This has been my home on the web for over two decades. You know where to find me.
We made them, we owe them better than this.
I'm going to end this polemic with a quote from the American Veterinary Medical Association:
Don’t rely on breed stereotypes to keep yourself safe from dog bites. A dog’s individual history and behavior are much more important than its breed, and since you don’t always know a dog’s history or behavior, it’s not a good idea to make assumptions. Instead, concentrate on prevention: educate yourself, teach children about proper interactions and behaviors with dogs, and learn how to recognize risky and escalating situations with aggressive dogs. These steps -- not breed-specific legislation -- will lead to fewer dog bites
Inimicus Dei Constituitur
Adding on here, because this has become my clearing house of stored information for dealing with the genocide supporters. Here's this paper from Austria, where they basically come to same conclusions as the ASPCA and the AVMA (yet all the genocide freaks INSIST that the ASPCA and the AVMA are bought and paid for, that they are just somehow "bully supporters" and these ASSHOLES are free to disregard these institutions). And the really stunning thing, even though there are the same breeds in Europe (ok, probably not too many APBT), there are NO Pit Bulls on this LIST. Why do you think that is?
And here's a paper from Canada that relied ONLY on actually reported evidence, and no media stories.
I'd also like to mention to anyone who believe the AVMA is bought and for by dog fighters that you are alone in your beliefs. Physcians and researches the world over cite the AVMA paper on dog bites. If the institution was suspect, there would not be enormous numbers of academics citing the organization. Try Google Scholar, look at the number of papers out there that cite the AVMA paper (among others)! And you are secure in your belief that you can simply dismiss the AVMA. Not so.